In the event that the Defendants did not pay each of the above fines, each of them is 100.

Some of the facts charged were corrected.

1. On April 20, 2017, at around 02:40, Defendant A expressed an expression of “D convenience stores” located in Busan Franchising C, and the singing practice room operated by Defendant B (n, 68 years of age) was assaulted on the part of the victim when he talks with the victim about the Defendant’s taking the customer into the nearby singing practice hall operated by Defendant.

2. Defendant B, at the time, and at the place specified in paragraph 1, assaulted the victim’s inner part of the victim A (65 years of age) to drink 1 and 2 times for the same reason.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. The protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against the Defendants

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a criminal investigation report (damage photographs, 14 pages of investigation records), investigation report (35 pages of investigation records, such as the photographs ofCCTV to capture);

1. Relevant Article 260 of the Criminal Act and the Defendants’ choice of punishment for the crime: Article 260 of the Criminal Act (Selection of Penalty)

1. Defendants to be detained in the workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act