아동복지법위반(상습아동학대)등
The judgment of the court below is reversed.
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.
The defendant's child abuse for 80 hours.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (three years of imprisonment with prison labor for one year suspended, three years of probation and medical treatment order, and 120 hours of course in child abuse treatment program) declared by the court below is deemed to be too uneasible and unfair.
2. Before determining the grounds for appeal by the prosecutor ex officio, Article 4(4) of the facts charged in the original judgment is included in Paragraph 1 of the same Article as Paragraph 1 of the facts charged in the original judgment, and Paragraph 1 of the same Article as Paragraph 1 of the same Article, Paragraph 4-b of the facts charged in the original judgment as Paragraph 1, Paragraph 1 of the same Article, Paragraph 4-B of the facts charged in the original judgment as Paragraph 1, Paragraph 1 of the same Article, Paragraph 1 of the facts charged in the original judgment, and Paragraph 1 of the same Article, Paragraph 4-C of the facts charged in the original judgment as Paragraph 1 of the same Article, and Paragraph 1 of the same Article, and Paragraph 1 of the same Article, Paragraph 3 of the facts charged in the original judgment as Item 1 of the same Article, and Paragraph 1 of the same Article shall be changed to Paragraph
3. Therefore, the judgment of the court below is reversed pursuant to Article 364(2) of the Criminal Procedure Act without examining the prosecutor's allegation of unfair sentencing, on the grounds of ex officio reversal, and the judgment below is again decided as follows.
[Dao-written judgment] Criminal facts and summary of evidence recognized by this court as criminal facts and summary of evidence are identical to each corresponding column of the judgment of the court below except for the dismissal of Paragraph (1) and deletion of Paragraph (4) as follows. Thus, it is acceptable to accept it as it is in accordance with Article 369 of the Criminal Procedure Act.
1. The Defendant who violated the Child Welfare Act (Habitual child abuse) is habitually:
A. From July to August 201, 201, around 17:00 on the date, the head is one time with the head of the plastic broom (20cm a length approximately 20cm a day) in the place of residence of the victim’s △△△△△△ located in Nam-gu, Busan, and on the grounds that the victim did not immediately return to the school after completing the school, and two times each.