2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

A. (1) The Plaintiff A’s occurrence of the instant accident is the Plaintiff’s low-speed car at around 12:40 on March 26, 2012 (hereinafter “Plaintiff’s vehicle”).

)를 운전하여 김해시 G에 있는 ‘H마트‘ 앞 신호등이 설치되지 않은 ’ㅏ‘자형 삼지교차로의 왕복 2차로(편도 1차로) 도로를 상동면사무소 방면에서 대동 방면으로 진행하다가 H마트 주차장 쪽으로 좌회전을 하려던 중, 위 도로를 반대방향으로 진행하던 피고 C 운전의 I 다마스 밴 화물차(이하 ’피고 차량‘이라고 한다

(C) The accident of this case refers to the accident of this case, where the accident of this case occurred in order for the Defendant’s vehicle to enter Hart to the above intersection (hereinafter “the accident of this case”).

2) On the two-lane road above, a yellow solid line is installed except for the intersection section. The width of the road is about 3.1m in the direction of the Plaintiff’s vehicle running, about 3.3m in the direction of the Defendant’s vehicle driving, and about 12.2m in the direction of the vehicle driving. The distance between the stop line in both directions is about 12.2m in both directions, and there was no visual obstacle.

3) The Plaintiff’s vehicle proceeded on the above road from the front side of the front side of the road to the front side of the stop line, and attempted to turn to the left at the Hart parking lot at almost every other point of the front side of the intersection. The instant accident occurred when the center line and the stop line of the Plaintiff’s vehicle’s driving direction lapse at the front side of the Plaintiff’s vehicle’s right side. 4) After the instant accident occurred, the Plaintiff’s vehicle turned to close to the center line under the front side of the center line, at least half of the center line. The distance from the rear side of the right side of the Plaintiff’s vehicle stopped after the accident to the stop line of the Plaintiff’s driving direction is about 90cm.

B. After the occurrence of the instant accident, immediately after the occurrence of the instant accident.