임금
1. The Defendant’s KRW 65,840,70 among the Plaintiff and KRW 5,179,980 among the Plaintiff, shall be KRW 1,646,120 from November 9, 2016.
1. Judgment on the plaintiff's claim
A. In addition to the purport of the entire arguments in the evidence evidence Nos. 1 and 2, the Defendant completed the business on June 30, 2016 without paying wages and retirement allowances to its employees, and notified the Plaintiff of the fact of bankruptcy, etc. on May 24, 2017 by the Government Branch of the Central Local Employment and Labor Agency upon the application of 11 employees, including B, etc. who retired from office as the Defendant, on May 24, 2017. Accordingly, upon being entrusted with the business by the Minister of Employment and Labor, the Plaintiff, who provided labor with part of wages and retirement allowances on behalf of the Defendant, provided labor to the Defendant, and paid the Plaintiff KRW 65,840,70 in total for three months, and the amount equivalent to three-year retirement allowances, including the amount equivalent to the wages and retirement allowances on behalf of the Defendant, may be recognized. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 27600, Nov. 5, 2016; Presidential Decree No. 28100, Jun. 17, 2017>
B. The Plaintiff’s subrogation of the right to claim wages, etc. payable to the Defendant within the scope of the amount payable pursuant to Article 8(1) of the Wage Claim Guarantee Act. As such, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff damages by 65,840,70 won per annum from July 21, 2017 to October 1, 2018, and by 15% per annum from the day following the date of service of a copy of the complaint in each case until October 1, 2018, with respect to 5,179,120 won from November 9, 2016 to June 19, 2017, 51,479,120 won from July 12, 2017 to the day of service of a copy of the complaint in each case, and damages by 5,179,980 won per annum from the day of service of a copy of each case to day of full payment.
2. The judgment of the defendant's assertion is not C but C, the actual representative director of the defendant is not C, but C, and C, the bankruptcy exemption.