beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 2015.11.25 2015가단33514

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The Defendant paid KRW 3,766,908 to the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from January 28, 2011 to November 25, 2015.

Reasons

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. 1) The Plaintiff’s vehicle B around January 28, 201 (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) around 06:05 on January 28, 201

(C) A C Driving D Taxi (hereinafter referred to as “instant taxi”) driving on the left side of the Plaintiff’s proceeding while driving his/her car along the intersection of Spanish in front of the Spanish in the Balam-dong in the Gwangju Mine-gu and driving his/her private road along three-lane two-lanes toward the Spanish distance in the direction of the Plaintiff.

2) The Plaintiff suffered injury, such as cage cage cages, etc. (hereinafter “instant accident”), due to the collision between the front part of the Plaintiff and the front part of the left part of the Plaintiff’s vehicle.

(2) The Defendant is a mutual aid business entity that entered into a mutual aid agreement with respect to the instant taxi.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 5, 6, 7 and 5 (including branch numbers, if any) and the purport of the whole pleadings

B. According to the above acknowledged facts, the defendant is liable to compensate the plaintiff for damages caused by the instant accident.

(c) A driver of a motor vehicle who intends to pass through an intersection by using the signal at the intersection of limitation of liability, because the signal at the intersection is fixed to a stop signal at the intersection or to a stop signal at the intersection, in violation of the signal, and therefore, the traffic signal at the intersection has a duty of care to check whether a motor vehicle has already entered the intersection at the left or right, even if the traffic signal is in operation in compliance with the traffic signal, and to keep the attitude to prevent accidents by driving, etc. while looking at the movement of such a motor vehicle, if there is such a vehicle.

(see, e.g., Supreme Court Decisions 94Da8693, Oct. 25, 1994; 95Da29369, Oct. 13, 1995). According to each of the statements, No. 1, No. 7-1, No. 7-2, and 3, prior to the instant accident, a signal to the direction of the instant taxi driving will be visible.