Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. On February 24, 2017, around 10:25, 2017, the Plaintiff’s vehicle (A) discovered and stopped the Defendant’s vehicle entering five lanes from the combined section to five lanes, and caused a shocker to the right side of the Plaintiff’s vehicle (No. 4, No. 1, No. 2, No. 4, and No. 5). In light of the fact that the Plaintiff’s vehicle, as a large cargo, did not have a large-scale vehicle operating on the front section to the front direction, it is reasonable to view the vehicle as a large cargo vehicle, and that the Plaintiff’s vehicle would not have any other operation of the vehicle to the front direction, and that the vehicle would not have any other operation of the vehicle to the front direction, and that the vehicle would not have any other operation of the vehicle to the front direction.