모욕
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
1. The Defendant, as the dong residents like the victim B, has a conflict of opinion as a preliminary work budget problem.
피고인은 2017. 8. 21. 17:49 경 전 남 나주시 C에 있는 피해자의 집 마당에서 D를 비롯한 마을 주민 4~5 명이 듣고 있는 가운데 피해자에게 “ 어디 싸가지 없이. 반장을 뭘 로 봤으면. 당신은 이 동네에서 살 자격이 없어.”, “ 씹하실 분” 이라고 큰 소리로 말하여 공연히 피해자를 모욕하였다.
2. The facts charged in the instant case are crimes falling under Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and may be prosecuted only upon a victim’s complaint pursuant to Article 312(1) of the same Act.
In this regard, on December 4, 2017, the victim, after the prosecution of this case, submitted a written withdrawal of complaint to this court and expressed his/her intent to revoke the complaint against the victim.
Therefore, the facts charged in this case constitute revocation of a complaint against an offense subject to victim's complaint, and thus, the prosecution is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparagraph 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act.