국가보안법위반등
The judgment below
The part against the defendant shall be reversed.
The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant.
1. The following facts are acknowledged according to the records of basic facts.
A. On January 22, 1982, the Seoul Criminal District Court convicted the Defendant of violation of the National Security Act, violation of public law, and violation of martial law, and sentenced the Defendant to three years of imprisonment and suspension of qualification.
[Attachment, the Defendant and the Prosecutor appealed against the foregoing Court [Attachment 81 High Court 883, 81 High Court 5934, 81 High Court 81, 981 (Joint)]. The Seoul High Court reversed the judgment of the court below on May 22, 1982 and sentenced the Defendant to two years of imprisonment and suspension of qualifications (the judgment of the above court 82No71 is stated as '81No772' but it appears that the case number is '81No772'). The above judgment became final and conclusive around that time.
[Judgment of review and judgment of the court below are 26 persons (C, D, E, F, G, H, J, K, K, M, M, N, P, P, Q, Q, S, T, U, V, W, X, Y, Z, and AA, Defendant). The judgment of the court below was pronounced not guilty, and the above judgment was finalized by the court of final appeal (Supreme Court Decision 82Do1847).
The remaining 24 persons except the defendant are "related persons for convenience".
A person shall be appointed.
B. As a result of the previous settlement committee for ascertaining the truth at the request of C, etc. to ascertain the truth, the former settlement committee for ascertaining the truth of the truth for the settlement of truth has ordered C, etc., on June 15, 2009, on the ground that C was unlawfully detained for 44 days from June 10, 1981 to July 23, 1981, and that the relevant persons were detained under illegal confinement, and that C was subject to advisory and cruel acts in the state of illegal confinement, the instant case was pronounced to the court by the relevant officers of the public security headquarters “AB association (hereinafter “AB”) related to AB association (hereinafter “AC”), N,O, P, Q, G, etc., and AC association (hereinafter “AC”), and forced C to make a statement through advisory and cruel acts without a warrant, and the prosecution prosecuted the relevant persons by the police in accordance with the details of the relevant police’s human rights violations.