2. Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

A. The prosecutor of the Ulsan District Prosecutors’ Office, etc., under the Defendant’s jurisdiction, conducted the investigation into Nonparty C who established and operated B in Ulsan, around 2011, and conducted the investigation into the said labor law office, the documents issued by the employees of the Korea Workers’ Compensation and Welfare Service, including the Plaintiff, were investigated as suspicion of violating the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act and the Act on the Protection of Personal Information of Public Institutions.

B. On December 2011, the prosecutor of the Ulsan District Prosecutors’ Office prosecuted the Plaintiff as follows:

(U) Ulsan District Court Decision 201Da5107). - On January 24, 2011, the Plaintiff sent the details of each place of business, which is data inside the Corporation, by facsimile in the office of the Corporation, upon request of D, who is an employee of the Seoul District Court of Labor Welfare, at the office of the Korea Workers’ Compensation and Welfare Service (Seoul District Court Decision 201Da5107). - From January 24, 201 to August 2011, the Plaintiff revealed the following facts: (a) from January 201 to August 2011, the details of the disaster in each place of business, which is data inside the Corporation, such as the details of each place of business, disability benefit, disability diagnosis, physical disability opinion, insurance benefit ledger, etc., and (b) at the same time, used personal information without any authority or provide it for another person’s use; and (c) at the same time, disclosed any confidential information learned in the course of performing its duties, thereby divulging the confidential information of Article 23(2), Article 111(3).

C. Around April 2012, the prosecutor submitted the attached Table 4 to the above trial proceedings and presented a written opinion that the following purport is included in the facts charged.

- The Plaintiff sent data to C, as shown in attached Table 4, from January 201 to August 2011.

The Ulsan District Court is not guilty on November 8, 2012 for the following reasons.