However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

피고인은 2018. 9. 23. 01:35경 포천시 B에 있는 C 노래장에서 음주소란 행위로 통고처분을 받은 것에 대한 항의 목적으로 112신고를 하여 현장에 출동한 포천경찰서 D지구대 소속 경장 피해자 E로부터 다시 경범죄처벌법위반(장난전화)으로 통고처분을 받게 되자 화가 나서 위 노래장 업주 등이 지켜보는 가운데 피해자에게 “이 시발 새끼야 나를 구속시켜라, 잡아가라.”라고 욕설을 하고, 피해자 E이 다시 경범죄처벌법위반(쓰레기등투기)으로 통고처분을 하였다는 이유로 “씨발놈아, 너 콱 죽여버린다.”라고 욕설을 하면서 E의 손을 쳐 휴대용 프린터기를 바닥에 떨어뜨리게 하고 주먹을 위로 치켜들어 때릴 것처럼 위협하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant openly insultingd the victim, and interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. A written statement of F and G;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the notification disposition taken photographs, motion picture photographs, and investigation reports (to listen to the light E telephone statement);

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Special Considerations in favor of the accused among the reasons for sentencing following the suspended sentence);

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act / [Scope of Recommendation] The application of multiple criminal processing standards that do not have a basic area (6-1-6 months) (6-1-6 months) of the obstruction of performance of official duties: The above crime whose sentencing guidelines are set for not less than six months and the insult that is not subject to the sentencing guidelines are concurrent crimes. Thus, the sentencing guidelines are set.