소유권확인
1. It shall be confirmed that the real estate stated in the separate sheet is owned by the plaintiff;
2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.
1. Determination on the cause of the claim
A. Comprehensively taking account of the purport of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 10 and the overall arguments, the plaintiff was the Confucian School Foundation established on February 4, 1998 pursuant to Article 3 of the Confucian School Property Act; ② The real estate stated in the attached list Nos. 1, 3 and 4 was assessed on April 20, 1912 by the Ulsan-gun Confucian School Foundation; and the attached list No. 2 of the attached list No. 2 of the real estate was transferred to the Ulsan-gun Confucian School Foundation on June 24, 1922; and the real estate stated in the attached list No. 5 of the attached list No. 5 was transferred to the Ulsan-gun Confucian School Foundation on February 25, 1912; ③ The registration of preservation of ownership was not made under the land’s land’s land’s land’s land’s land’s land’s land’s land title was opened from Ulsan-do on May 19, 1995.
B. Meanwhile, the Confucian School Property Act, enacted on January 10, 1962, (No. 194, enacted on May 194, 194) and the Revised School Property Act (No. 194, enacted on May 194, 194, enacted on the Management of Confucian School Property), have each Special Metropolitan City, Metropolitan City, Do, and Special Self-Governing Province establish an incorporated foundation for the management and operation of the Confucian School Property within their jurisdiction, and have strict regulations on the management and operation of the Confucian School Property
C. In light of the above facts and the provisions of the Confucian School Property Act, each real estate listed in the attached list (hereinafter “instant real estate”) is a Confucian School property, belonging to the Plaintiff, which is a Confucian School Foundation having jurisdiction over the Ulsan Metropolitan City in the past pursuant to the provisions of the Confucian School Property Act, and thus, the Plaintiff has the substantial capacity to dispose of profits from the use of the instant real estate. Thus, the instant real estate is deemed as the Plaintiff’s ownership.
In addition, when the plaintiff applied for the registration of ownership transfer on the premise that the real estate in this case is owned by the plaintiff, the name and land cadastre of the defendant.