In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fines, only 100,000.

1. On November 14, 2013, Defendant A distributed products that imitated the functionalityr of the Defendant Company (C) in F and G through the patent attorney E at the office of D Co., Ltd. located in Namyang-si, Namyang-si, Inc., Ltd., and around November 14, 2013, Defendant A distributed and sold them. All these products are illegal that infringed the Defendant Company’s right of good faith, and the court is proceeding against this.

‘Cooperation with the owner of the utility model right' was sent a notice of ‘Cooperation with the owner of the utility model right'.

However, in fact, H Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Appellant”) did not infringe on the Defendant Company’s right to know. (D)

Nevertheless, the defendant spreads false information by sending such notification to the principal of the company, thereby impairing the honor of the complainant, and at the same time hindering the business of the complainant.

2. From September 6, 2013 to August 1, 2014, Defendant B posted a notice on Defendant B’s Internet block that “The Defendant’s functional belle of the Defendant Company (Co., Ltd. D) was an even corner of the Defendant Company (the Defendant Company)’s functional bell that it was an even corner of the Defendant Company (the Defendant Company D).”

However, the complainant did not infringe on the right of the defendant company (D) to be used by the defendant company.

Nevertheless, the Defendant posted such false information to allow many, unspecified people to access the Internet, thereby impairing the honor of the complainant, and at the same time hindering the business of the complainant.

Summary of Evidence

1. A witness I and each legal statement of the J;

1. A complaint;

1. Written answers (not more than 8 pages of investigation records), and documents prepared (not more than 97 pages of investigation records);

1. Court rulings (2013 Gohap 63047);

1. A copy of a notification;

1. The screen (except for the part on which the opinions of 190 pages or lower of investigation records and lower end are recorded) after closure of the Internet blogs;