The judgment below

Even if examining the reasoning of the instant facts charged based on evidence, the lower court did not exhaust all necessary deliberations and did not err by misapprehending the rules of logic and experience, or by misapprehending the burden of proof in a vessel investigation, criminal case, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on impossible crimes, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal.

Of the grounds of appeal, the argument that the lower court erred in the misapprehension of legal principles as to the commencement of the crime of child trafficking shall not be a legitimate ground of appeal, as it is alleged in the final appeal that the lower court did not consider it as the grounds of appeal or as the subject of ex officio judgment

Furthermore, even if examining the records in light of the records, the court below did not err by misapprehending the legal principles as asserted in the grounds of appeal.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.