However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

피고인은 2019. 12. 26. 22:28경 의정부시 B에 있는 ‘C주점’ 앞 노상에서 112 신고를 받고 출동한 의정부경찰서 D지구대 소속 경장 E으로부터 귀가할 것을 요청받자 위 E에게 “니 애비다, 19년 전에 내가 아빠 찾아달라고 했을 때 니네 뭐했냐, 이 개새끼들아 씨발”라고 욕설하고, 오른 발로 위 E의 왼쪽 정강이 부분을 1회 걷어찼고, 계속하여 같은 날 22:32경 위 주점 앞 노상에서 지원 요청을 받고 위 장소에 도착한 순찰차가 지나가는 것을 보고 순찰차에 달려가 운전석 창문을 두드리고 운전석 문을 열려고 하였고, 의정부경찰서 D지구대 소속 순경 F이 위 순찰차 보조석에서 내려 귀가할 것을 요구하자 위 F에게 “이 씨발놈아 너가 날 버려 개새끼야 씨발”라고 욕설하고, 왼쪽 발로 위 F의 오른쪽 허벅지 부분을 2회 걷어찼다.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the handling of 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of E and F;

1. Investigation report (verification of CCTV images for crime prevention);

1. A work status list and a report of 112 cases processing;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on site photographs, E, and F photographs;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the community service order;

1. Scope of punishment by law: Imprisonment with prison labor for one month to seven years and six months;

2. Scope of recommended sentences according to the sentencing criteria;

(a) First Crimes (Determination of the Suspension of Performance of Official Duties) / [Attachment 1] No person who has the obstruction of performance of official duties [No person who has been specially punished] (the scope of the recommendation field and recommendation range] basic area, six months to one year and six months;

B. Second Crimes (Obstruction of Performance of Official Duties) (Determination of Punishment).