beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.11.25 2016고합1010

성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(13세미만미성년자위계등추행)등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.

disclosure and notification of information on the accused for five years.

, however, subject.

Reasons

Criminal facts

On January 14, 2016, the Seoul Eastern District Court sentenced the defendant to suspend the execution of two years and six months, and probation on January 22, 2016. The judgment became final and conclusive on January 22, 2016.

【Criminal Facts】

1. Around 15:00 on June 26, 2016, the Defendant of Child Welfare Act violation (Child Abuse), and Child Welfare Act violation (Child Sexual Harassment, etc.) (hereinafter referred to as “Child”). Around 15:00, the Defendant approached that the Victim D (F, 7), E (8), F (n, 7 years old) moved to the c commercial building in Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and that the Defendant would assist the installation of a content.

The Defendant installed a studio on the first floor of the commercial building, laid the said victims into a stud, laid the stude, and displayed a obscenity image of the said victims, stating that “Ising away from the stude, Ma, which is absolutely not an absolute test,” and showing a obscenity photograph, etc. drawn by using mobile phones, and indicating that the stude women in the stude body put the stude into the stude in the stude, and laid the stude in the stude, and laid the stude in the stude.

As a result, the Defendant committed emotional abuse that harms the mental health and development of children, and committed sexual harassment that causes sexual humiliation to children.

2. Around 18:00 on June 26, 2016, the Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (Indecent Acts such as Minor, etc. under the age of 13), along with obscene video images showing the victim’s sexual intercourse with his/her personal body as a result of the obscenity from the G kindergarten’s corridor located in the above commercial building, the Defendant displayed the victim’s obscenity video image with his/her sexual intercourse with his/her personal body, and her knick and bucks.

The defendant continues to take the gender of the defendant into consideration and "one time", and the defendant refuses to do so to do so.

참조조문