If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

When a person who has obtained a permit or permit for alteration, or has filed a report or report on alteration, installs or alters the relevant emission facilities, he/she shall install air pollution preventive facilities to ensure that pollutants emitted from such emission facilities fall below the permissible

Nevertheless, from April 2015 to May 31, 2019, the Defendant installed one industrial treatment facility (1.82 cubic meters x 1.00 cubic meters x 1), which is an emission facility, at the three places of business operated by the Defendant from May 31, 2015 to May 31, 2019, and operated the air pollution prevention facility, which connects the above emission facility and the preventive facility (500 cubic meters metres).

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Request for an investigation into a business establishment that violates the Environmental Management Act or a request for case investigation;

1. A written statement and written confirmation of the detection;

1. On-site photographs;

1. A permit to install a standby emission facility (the Defendant’s volume on the Defendant’s industrial disposal facility is not only 1.82 cubic meters but also 0.688 cubic meters from 0.68 cubic meters (hereinafter “Act”).

The Court argues that the amount of pollutants discharged from the above facilities does not constitute a violation of the law, and that it does not constitute a violation of the law.

However, according to the permission to install air emission facilities in the Defendant's workplace on April 27, 2015, the Defendant discharges pollutants such as dust, sulfur oxides, nitrogen oxides, salt compounds, and sediative cargo in the gold process using 1.82 cubic meters of the volume of the waste disposal facilities in the city on April 27, 2015, and the Defendant installs a 500 cubic meters of the preventive facilities by absorption.

“A change in the content is recognized to have been permitted as it is, and this fact is not forged in this court, but stated that the defendant has been permitted as reported by the defendant, and the defendant reduces the volume after the above change.