beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 2015.07.08 2015나775

물품대금

Text

1. All appeals filed by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) against the principal lawsuit and counterclaim are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be principal lawsuit and counterclaim.

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows: “In September 201,” “In September 201,” “in September 201,” “in September 201,” “in addition,” “in front of the 6th and 9th,” “in addition,” “in the 6th and 10th,” “in the 6th and 10th,” “in the 6th and 6th examination results of the court’s on-site inspection,” and “in the 6th and 10th examination results of the court’s on-site inspection”, the court’s explanation is identical to the ground for the first instance court’s judgment, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's main claim is dismissed as it is without merit, and the defendant's counterclaim is justified within the above scope of recognition, and the remaining counterclaim is dismissed as it is without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal against the main claim and counterclaim is all dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.