However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 01:00 on February 7, 2019, the Defendant opened a door of DSS7 car owned by the victim C, which was not corrected in the alley of B apartment at Gwangjuyang-si, and committed a theft with cash of KRW 300,000,000,000 from around that time, up to March 6, 2019, the Defendant stolen KRW 1,048,50 in the same way, such as the list of crimes in the attached Table, and attempted to commit a 10-time attempt.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each statement of E, F, G, H, I, and C;

1. Statement of seizure of each police;

1. Investigation report (verification, etc. of CCTV video data of the Mine-Viewing Control Center), investigation report (suspect's criminal investigation, etc.), investigation report (verification, etc. of the suspect), and investigation report;

1. Each register of automobiles;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act, Articles 322 and 329 of the Criminal Act, Articles 342 and 329 of the Criminal Act, and choice of imprisonment with prison labor, respectively, for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Determination of the types of punishment for the reasons of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act in consideration of the nature of each of the crimes in this case, the method and frequency of crimes;

However, if the defendant is the first offender, the amount of damage is relatively minor, the crime is committed in the attempted crime, the agreement is reached with some victims, the defendant's age, reflectability, and family relations, and the various sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments of this case shall be determined in the same manner as the order.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.