beta
(영문) 수원지방법원안산지원 2019.03.08 2017가단60294

손해배상(의)

Text

1. The plaintiffs' claims against the defendant are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The parties concerned Plaintiff B and C are the parents of Plaintiff A, and the Defendant is the intention of the EB EB member who treated Plaintiff B from August 5, 2016 to September 1, 2016 (hereinafter “Defendant member”).

B. (1) On August 5, 2016, Plaintiff A received treatment from Defendant Council members due to infection and heat, etc. (2) On August 11, 2016, Plaintiff A received treatment from Plaintiff A, who was in the form of a symptoms, such as sheshesheshesheshesheshe was in the form of sheshel and shelshel, and received treatment from Plaintiff A, who was in the form of Ginsia located in F in Silst City, with the diagnosis of “pinant finite finite, which is not accompanied by a high wave,” and received opinions from Nonparty A and all of them.

3) On August 13, 2016, Plaintiff A re-entered Defendant Council members and received a total of 12 medical treatment until September 1, 2016. The medical record column for the aforementioned Plaintiff’s medical record included “Weld 200 to 0.6 m. 10 m. 200 m. 8 m. 200 m. 15 m. 2000 m. 8 m. 205 m. 8m. 2000 m. 8m. 8m. 2016 m. 8m. 201. 8m. 6m. 8m. 8m. 201. 8m. 8m. 8m. 201. 8m. 8m. 2016. 8m. 8m. 8m. 201. 8m.”

Nos. 1 and 14; the results of each request for appraisal to the H Hospital Head of this Court; the results of each request for complementary appraisal; the purport of the entire pleadings.

2. Summary of the cause of the claim;

A. The defendant's breach of duty of care, ① the defendant's 's level of 'A'.