(영문) 의정부지방법원 2013.10.30 2013고단2549
도로법위반
Text
The defendant is innocent.
Reasons
1. A’s violation of vehicle operation restriction at around 14:05 on February 22, 2007, a defendant’s employee, at the time of the charge [2013 highestest 2550] - the Government District Court Decision 2006 highest 25867 on October 22, 2006:32, a vehicle operation restriction violation at around 204:32, a defendant’s employee
2. The provision of the former Road Act, which applied to the above facts charged, was retroactively invalidated by the Constitutional Court that rendered a decision of unconstitutionality.
Therefore, since the above facts charged constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, the defendant is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.
참조조문
-도로법