If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

1. On May 19, 2013, at around 13:40 on May 19, 2013, the Defendant interfered with the business of the Defendant: (a) placed “D” 'D' 'D' operated by the victim C, which is operated by the victim C, b; (b) placed the victim a b0-minute disturbance in a luscing manner; and (c) caused the above victim to go through a luscing manner; and (d) prevented the said victim from receiving the customer, thereby interfering with the business of selling the said victim’

2. 공무집행방해 피고인은 2013. 5. 19. 14:15경 광먕시 E에 있는 광명경찰서 F파출소에서 위 1항과 같이 업무를 방해한 것으로 인하여 현행범인으로 체포되어 경찰서로 인계되기 위해 대기하다가 위 F파출소 소속 경사 G의 복부를 발로 걷어차 경찰관의 파출소 질서유지 및 현행범 인계 등에 관한 정당한 공무집행을 방해하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. C’s statement;

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes on photographing Damage, such as a investigative report (No. 6), a screen screen of video images;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of each fine for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;