공무집행방해
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.
Punishment of the crime
Around 19:10 on January 29, 2019, the Defendant, at the “C” parking lot located in Asan City B, and at the 112 report, assaulted the Defendant with slope E and Fmanman on one occasion, including, without any justifiable reason, she took a bath to ask the Defendant whether he/she had gone to a slope E and F in the D District of the ASEAN Police Station, who was called at the site after having received a report on the said 112.
Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Each police statement concerning E and F;
1. G statements;
1. Photographs;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports;
1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime concerned;
1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;
1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;
1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;
1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for the provisional payment order recognize and reflects the defendant's mistake, and there is no record of punishment for the same kind of crime, and obstruction of performance of official duties requires a strict punishment as an offense prejudicial to the function of the State by nullifying the exercise of legitimate public authority. The crime of this case is committed by assaulting police officers who intend to help the defendant under the influence of alcohol, and the nature of the crime is poor, and the punishment is determined as ordered in consideration of the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, relationship with the victim, motive, means and consequence of the crime, circumstances after the crime, and other various conditions of sentencing as shown in the argument of this case.