도로법위반
The defendant shall be innocent.
1. On November 3, 2005, the Defendant: (a) his employee violated the Defendant’s duties in violation of the restriction on the operation of the vehicle of the Road Management Agency by operating the said truck in a state where it is loaded with freight of 1.17 soil over 10 tons of the limitation 10 tons on the said truck at the business office of the Cheongdo-dong, Seoul, a Cheongdo-dong, a Cheongdo-dong, Cheongdo-dong, Cheongdo-dong, in a direction-setting 6.5km-ro, an outer-ro, Seoul.5km-dong.
2. Article 2 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920, Jan. 5, 1995; Act No. 7832, Dec. 30, 2005; Act No. 832, Oct. 28, 2010; Act No. 2014, Oct. 28, 2010; Act No. 2014, Oct. 28, 2010; Act No. 2013, Oct. 28, 2010; Act No. 2487, Oct. 22, 2005; Act No. 20144, Oct. 28, 2010; Act No. 2020, Jan. 5, 2005; Act No. 20148, Feb. 28, 201).
Thus, the facts charged of this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, and thus, is acquitted pursuant to the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.