However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On November 2, 2018, the Defendant driven a B B body-man car on November 2, 2018, driving 530 short-term distance from the west at the city of the prime city to the distance of unification.

At that time, the car of the victim C(the age of 46) was stopped in the signal atmosphere, and therefore, the driver of the vehicle was obliged to prevent the accident in advance by accurately operating the brake and steering gear and stopping after the above Abeo car.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so, and received the rear part of the said Abea car as the front part of the said Abea car by negligence.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by such occupational negligence, committed an injury to the victim C, such as salt, tensions, etc. of a horse requiring approximately two weeks of medical treatment, and sustained injury to the victim E (here, 43 years old) who was on the said Abea car, such as salt, tensions, etc. in need of medical treatment for about three weeks, and attempted to stop the said Abea car without taking measures such as aiding the victims, even though it damages the said 361,020 won for repair costs.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. C Witness’s testimony;

1. Each police statement of E;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident and a report on actual condition investigation;

1. Each written diagnosis and medical examination and treatment (E);

1. Written estimate of damaged vehicles;

1. An accident site photograph;

1. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court of this case, the defendant confirmed part of the damage inflicted on the motor vehicle immediately after the traffic accident in this case. However, the victim did not inform the insurance company, etc. of contact information while communicating to the insurance company, etc. for dealing with the accident and did not speak.