However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a Bran XG car.

On 18:56 on 25, 2014, the Defendant changed the lane to a two-lane while driving the racing tunnel, which is a motorway in the upper fluence of the YY, on the fluent side of the racing, from the fluence to the one speed of about 80km in speed at the fluence of the two-lanes.

At the same time, a car driven along the Defendant’s second lane was in progress. In such a case, there was a duty of care to change the lane with due care to ensure that the person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle is not in conflict with other motor vehicles by keeping the front, rear and left well.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and changed the running lane from the first to the second two-lane as it is, caused the victim C(57 years of age) who driven the same two-lane to the right side of the said franchise, and thereby caused the said rocketing car to conflict with the above tunnel, the right side of the said tunnel.

The Defendant’s negligence caused the injury to the victim C, who is a driver of the said rocketing car, to undergo approximately two weeks’ medical treatment; the injury to the Hashetop car victim E (the 48 years old); the injury to the Hashes E (the 51 year old) that requires approximately two weeks’ medical treatment; the injury to the Hashes E (the 51 year old) the Hashes E, which requires approximately two weeks’ medical treatment; the injury to the Hashes E (the 20 year old), to the Hashes G (the 20 year old) requiring approximately two weeks’ medical treatment; the injury to the Hashes E (the 5 year old Hashes E), including the injury to the Hashes Hashes, which requires approximately four weeks’ treatment; and the injury to the Hashes E (the 5 years old Hashes E, the first injury to the Hashes Hashes E, other than the Hashesebram.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C.