소유권말소등기
1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The first instance court.
1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning the instant case is as follows, except for the case where the first instance court saw the first instance court's first instance court's second instance's second instance's second instance's second instance's second instance's second instance's second instance's second instance's second instance's second instance's second instance's second instance's second instance'
[3] On the other hand, even if a person liable for the registration of ownership transfer on the ground of the completion of the prescription period is the owner at the time of the completion of the prescription period, and even if he/she is the owner with the knowledge of the completion of the prescription period and completed the registration of ownership transfer, barring special circumstances such as implied or explicit agreement between the owner by acquiring the above obligation and performing the said obligation, he/she shall not be deemed to succeed to the above obligation (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 93Da5066, 50673, Apr. 12, 1994). We examine the case back to the case, and examine the completion date of the prescription period for the Plaintiff’s assertion on the completion of the ownership transfer registration on July 1, 2013, which was the first day of the completion date of the prescription period for the acquisition of real estate, and even if the Plaintiff’s domestic house acquired the ownership transfer registration on the ground of donation due to the Plaintiff’s assertion that the acquisition of ownership transfer registration was completed as well as the Plaintiff’s claim.
2.2.