손해배상(기)
1. All appeals by the plaintiffs and the defendant are dismissed.
2. Of the appeal costs, the part resulting from the plaintiffs' appeal.
1. The reasoning of the lower court’s acceptance of the judgment of the first instance is as follows, and thus, it is consistent with the reasoning of the first instance judgment.
2. The amended part of the judgment of the court of first instance (hereinafter “the instant construction contract was concluded between the defendant and the non-party company”) was sentenced to “the first and second parts “,” at the bottom of the third part of the judgment of the court of first instance,” and was sentenced to “the conclusion of the instant construction contract between the defendant and the non-party company.”
The following shall be added between the fourth 2 and third tier of the first instance judgment:
1) On September 15, 2011, the Defendant lodged a complaint with the purport that “the Plaintiff did not request the instant construction from the Defendant, but claimed the construction cost thereof.” On January 13, 2012, the prosecutor of the Cheongyang Branch Office of the Cheongyang District Prosecutors’ Office issued a disposition without suspicion against the Plaintiffs on the ground that it is difficult to deem that the Plaintiffs did not request construction from the Defendant.
(C) At the time of filing a petition for adjudication, the Defendant’s accusation against the Defendant, the complainant, was dismissed on April 18, 2012, and the petition for adjudication was dismissed on May 27, 2012.
2. On October 24, 2011, the Defendant submitted the instant construction contract document design contract, power of attorney, order contract, permission for diversion of farmland, plan for diversion of farmland, plan for prevention of damage to the use of farmland, plan for construction for large scale repair, and report on modification of the purpose of construction and substantial repair to the viewing by forging it, and forced the instant construction work by intimidation, and forced it to demand money for the construction cost.
'' has filed a complaint with the content of the complaint.
The prosecutor of the Goyang Branch Office of the Government's Provincial Prosecutors' Office shall be the prosecutor on March 16, 2012.