Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

On January 21, 2018, at around 02:00, the Defendant was able to avoid a disturbance, such as: (a) in the “D” restaurant for the victim C’s operation located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and (b) in the instant case, the Defendant was able to avoid a disturbance by: (c) the Defendant expressed the victim with a large voice, “Ise, fright, fright, fright, hump, and hump”; (d) taking a bath to the customers who drink in the next table.

As a result, the Defendant had expressed a great voice for about one hour and interfered with the victim's restaurant business by force by avoiding disturbance.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (the counter-investigation of shots E);

1. Article 314 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;