However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is a person who has violated the prohibition on driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol on November 30, 2008 by driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol 0.05% on July 4, 2013 and 0.070% of alcohol level on July 4, 2013 at least twice.

On September 25, 2013, around 20:25, the Defendant driven a B-hurbn vehicle while under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.208% at the 43-lane 17, Gumi-si.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written report from an employee of an employer;

1. Previous records: Application of criminal records, inquiry records, and copies of summary order Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal Facts, Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act include a number of defendants with the same kind and the same criminal records, and in particular, on March 31, 201, for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a violation of the Act on the Punishment of Violences, etc., with a deadly weapon, etc., a suspended sentence of three years shall be imposed; and

4. 8. 위 판결이 확정되어 집행유예기간 중 음주운전을 하여 벌금형의 처벌을 받은 점, 그럼에도 또다시 집행유예기간 중 음주운전을 하고 주차된 차량을 들이받아 또 다른 차량과 부딪히게 하고 담벼락까지 들이받은 사고를 일으킨 점, 음주수치가 매우 높은 점 등 불리한 정상 및 몸이 불편한 노모의 바람 쐬러 가자는 요청으로 음주운전을 하여 그 동기에 있어서 참작할 사정이 있는 점, 동종범죄로 벌금형을 초과하는 전과는 없는 점 등 유리한 정상 등 제반 사정을 참작하여, 주문과 같이 형을 정한다.