2. The judgment of the court below was made on April 6, 2004 that the defendant led to the confession of the crime of this case, and that the defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for the violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc., but there were extenuating circumstances, such as the fact that each crime of this case was committed more than 10 years thereafter. However, the court below seems to reflect the sentencing in consideration of these circumstances, despite the fact that the court below had been already punished five times due to the violation of the Psychotropic Drugs Control Act and the violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc., the defendant again committed the crime of this case, and other various circumstances, including the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime of this case, etc., and the sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments, including the circumstances after the crime of this case, it shall not be deemed that the sentence of the court below is too heavy or that the suspension period of execution

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit.