Text

1. The Defendant’s executory exemplification of the payment order finalized on October 12, 2016 by Seoul Southern District Court (Seoul Southern District Court) 2016 tea 72657.

Reasons

1. Since movable property in the separate list indicating the claim is owned by the plaintiff, it is unreasonable that the defendant seizes the above movable property by compulsory execution based on the payment order (Seoul Southern District Court Decision 2016Hu72657) against B. 2. Judgment without holding any pleadings (Article 208(3)1 of the Civil Procedure Act)