beta
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2017.03.29 2017고단647

도로법위반

Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The specification of the facts charged

A. On May 27, 1998, the defendant's employee, violation of the restriction on operation at the Gyeong-si's Gyeong-si's Gyeong-si's 12.2 km-si's Gyeong-si's Gyeong-si's 12.2 km-si's Gyeong-si's Gyeong-si's Gyeong-si's 1471-2's 1471-2's Gyeong-si's 1423.5 km-si's Gyeong-si's Gyeong-si's Gyeong-si's 1999.

2. The penal provisions applicable to a summary order subject to review have retroactively lost its effect in accordance with the Constitutional Court’s decision of unconstitutionality (Supreme Court Decision 2010Hun-Ga14, 15, 21, 27, 35, 38, 44, 70 (Joint) Decided October 28, 2010), and thus, the Defendant shall be acquitted pursuant to the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.