명예퇴직수당지급거부처분취소
1. After remand, the plaintiff's claim that is changed in exchange from the trial is dismissed.
2. The Plaintiff’s total costs of litigation.
Basic Facts
The plaintiff passed the 30th judicial examination in 198, and was appointed as a judicial trainee on March 1989, and completed the Judicial Research and Training Institute on February 1991 after the two-year training period.
3. 1. Around February 2010, an application for the payment of honorary retirement allowances was filed to the Defendant, while serving as a judge, and submitted to the Defendant around February 2010.
On February 28, 2010, the Plaintiff voluntarily retired, and at the time, the Plaintiff’s age was 51 years of age and was 1 year prior to the expiration date of the Plaintiff’s age ( February 28, 2011).
(The plaintiff has been reappointed once during his service, and the number of years of service under the Public Officials Pension Act, including the period of active duty service, has reached 24 years).