Defendant

A is a person who operates an international marriage broker in the name of "C International Marriage", and Defendant B is a person who works for "C International Marriage" as a person who works for "C International Marriage", and there is no fact that he/she operated an international marriage broker (branch) in a foreign country, or entered into a contract with a local marriage broker who has reported and approved the foreign country, and there is no fact that he/she dispatched his/her "C International Marriage Employees" (employee) in the country concerned.

1. Nevertheless, around February 2013, the Defendant placed a false and exaggerated advertisement with the phrase “Local Branch (Administrative Team, Interpretation Team, Korean Language School, and Driving) of Vietnam,” which is different from objective facts, in the column of “Local Branch (Administrative Team, Interpretation Team, Korean Language School,” and “Local Branch (Local Branch, Interpretation Team, Administrative Team, and New Marriage Tour)” in order to publicize the said company at the Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, and 2nd International Marriage Office.

2. Defendant A, at the above date and place, committed a violation as set forth in the above paragraph (1) by the above Defendant B, who is an employee with respect to his duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A criminal investigation report (a photographic paper taken of inside and outside of aC International Marriage Office);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photograph the screen and organizing column of the CCR website;

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

A. Defendant A: Articles 27, 26(2)6, and 12(1) of the Marriage Brokers Business Management Act; selection of fines

B. Defendant B: Articles 26(2)6 and 12(1) of the Marriage Brokers Business Management Act; selection of fines

1. Punishment of a fine not exceeding 1,000,000 won to be suspended; and

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act for the detention in a workhouse;

1. The fact that the Internet homepage was closed after the crime of this case under Article 59(1) of the Criminal Code of the Suspension of Pronouncement, the defendants are in depth against the defendant.