매매대금
1. The lawsuit of this case shall be dismissed.
2. The costs of retrial shall be borne by the plaintiff.
purport, purport, ..
1. Although a court of determination as to the legitimacy of a lawsuit for retrial of this case had been dismissed and confirmed through several times for the same reason, it is obvious that the same request for retrial has not been accepted by law would result in bullying against the other party, and further, it would be unnecessary to spend judicial personnel, barring any special circumstance, such a lawsuit is not allowed (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2005Da303, Nov. 10, 2005). Thus, it is obvious that the Plaintiff filed a petition for retrial (Ulsan District Court Decision 2007Na192, Ulsan District Court 209Na11, Ulsan District Court 201, Ulsan District Court 2010Na79, Ulsan District Court 2012Na73, Ulsan District Court 2012Na431, Ulsan District Court 2012Na431, U. Ulsan District Court 2013Na3614, U.S. District Court 20136.
Therefore, there is no special circumstance that the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit in the instant case and should have the right to protection. Thus, the lawsuit in the instant case constitutes an abuse of the right to file a lawsuit, and thus, the lawsuit cannot be allowed.
2. As such, the lawsuit of this case is unlawful and thus, it is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.