On March 21, 2012, the Defendant: (a) requested that C, operating B, from April 20, 2012 to April 21, 2012, to visit the GIC; and (b) C, even though the Defendant was not an employee of B, did not have any connection with B’s business, entered the GIC system into the name “A”; (c) workplace “B”; (d) position “B”; and (e) visit the GIC with the approval of the Minister of Unification by unlawful means; and (e) visited the GIC with the approval of the visit by the Minister of Unification.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the immigration status of individuals;

1. Article 27 (1) 2 and Article 9 (1) of the Inter-Korean Exchange and Cooperation Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (50,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act for the inducement of a workhouse;

1. Penalty fine of KRW 1,000,000 to be suspended;

1. The sentencing of Article 59(1) of the suspended sentence is based on the following: (a) the Defendant was committed by committing an offense; (b) the first offender without any previous conviction; and (c) the Defendant, along with the Defendant, visited the North Korean GIC, has taken a disposition of suspending the indictment; and (d) the sentence is suspended as ordered.