2. The purpose of general traffic obstruction under Article 185 of the Criminal Act is to punish all acts that make it impossible or considerably difficult to pass by causing damage to or infusing land, road, etc., or interfering with traffic by other means, as an offense, under the legal interest protected by the law of the general public’s traffic safety (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 95Do1475, Sept. 15, 1995). Moreover, general traffic obstruction is a so-called abstract dangerous offense, where traffic is impossible or considerably difficult, and the result of traffic obstruction should not be practically caused.

(1) In light of the above legal principles, the court below held that the Defendant’s act of drinking alcohol as well as drinking alcohol, etc. at the time of the assembly or demonstration in this case, which was duly adopted and investigated by the Health Team, the first instance court, and the size of the assembly or demonstration, such as the number of participants, etc. at the time of the assembly or demonstration in this case, and the amount of demonstration following the completion of the assembly or demonstration in this case, as well as the situation and place where the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender following the assembly or demonstration at the scene of the assembly or demonstration in this case; in particular, at the investigation agency, the Defendant appeared to drink as a flagrant offender at the scene of the assembly or demonstration in this case; and in particular, at the first time, the Defendant appeared to have not attended the assembly or demonstration in this case; and later, the Defendant participated in the above assembly or demonstration in the first instance court and had ordered dissolution, but other participants were not dissolved.