However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

At around 10:00 on August 23, 2012, the Defendant: (a) threatened the victim with the cacker’s cacker’s cacker’s cacker, which is a dangerous object from chemical cacker, on the ground that the victim D (n, 30 years of age) marks the cacker’s cacker’s cacker; (b) caused the victim to go over the ground level; and (c) caused the victim to go beyond the cacker’s cacker’s cacker for about two weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Part of statement D in the second police interrogation protocol against the accused;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. A written diagnosis on D;

1. A criminal investigation report (Attachment to medical records of a victim);

1. 사진, 사건 관련 녹화영상 (위 각 증거에 의하면, 피해자가 피고인이 운전하는 포크레인 앞에서 피고인을 촬영하자 피고인은 피해자에게 욕설을 하면서 갑자기 포크레인의 버킷을 피해자의 머리 위로 들어 올려 찍어 내릴 듯이 위협하였고 이에 피해자가 놀라 바닥에 넘어지면서 엉덩방아를 찧은 사실이 인정되는데, 위 사실에 의하면, 당시 피고인에게 미필적으로나마 피해자에 대한 상해의 고의가 있었다고 봄이 타당하다) 법령의 적용

1. Article 3 (1) and Article 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act on Criminal Offense, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 201Do1248, Apr. 1, 201; Supreme Court Decision 201Do129, Apr. 2, 201

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Discretionary Reasons for Discretionary mitigation);