The lower court found the Defendant guilty of the instant facts charged on the grounds indicated in its reasoning.

Examining the record in accordance with the relevant legal doctrine, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on “sexual abuse” under Article 17 subparag. 2 of the Child Welfare Act.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.