However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant was a person who operated the "C Multilateral" in the Gyeongbuk-gun B, and the victims were the customers of the defendant.

1. On December 19, 2014, the Defendant requires the victim’s “accommen hospital cost for multi-party employees who work together” in the victim E’s out-of-the-counter arguments located in Seongbuk-gun, Seongbuk-gun, Seongbuk-gun.

It shall be repaid in three days or one week from the lending of money.

‘False speech' was made.

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to repay even if he borrowed money from the injured party.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above and received 3 million won from the injured party on the same day.

2. The Defendant, at the same place as before December 31, 2014 at the same time as before, and at the same time as, the victim E, shall be reimbursed within one week if he/she loans to the victim E.

‘False speech' was made.

However, there was no intention or ability to repay even if money is borrowed.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above and was delivered KRW 5 million from the victim to the same day.

3. On October 30, 2014, the Defendant calls the victim F at a non-place of not more than Sung-gun, Gyeong-gun, Gyeong-gun on the phone of October 30, 2014, and “The father needs to write down the horse.”

The loan shall be repaid promptly.

‘False speech' was made.

However, there was no intention or ability to repay even if money is borrowed.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above and transferred KRW 2 million to the defendant's agricultural bank account on the same day from the victim.

4. On November 5, 2014, the Defendant: (a) from the monthly port Nos. 1888, the Defendant: (b) around 2014, the Defendant: (c) around 5, 2014, the Victim G needs to engage in annoying activity by his father.

The credit card interest shall be paid after the month.

‘False speech' was made.

However, there was no intention or ability to repay even if money is borrowed.

As above, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and deceivings the victim, i.e., KRW 2 million from the victim.