beta
(영문) 부산지방법원 2016.04.29 2016고정985

화물자동차운수사업법위반

Text

The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No owner or user of a private-use truck shall provide such private-use truck commercially for transport of cargo.

At around 11:00 on October 6, 2015, the Defendant, using a private-use truck (BDaS) owned by the Defendant, transported freight to a factory in D located at the bottom of the Busan Sho-gu, Busan, to a factory where the trade name is unknown, and received KRW 7,000 as transportation cost and provided a private-use truck for transport purpose at a cost.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E;

1. A written accusation and a statement of the detection;

1. Original Register of Automobile Registration;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 67 of the relevant Act and Articles 67 subparagraph 5 and 56 of the alternative trucking Transport Business Act concerning facts constituting an offense, and the selection of fines;

1. A fine not exceeding 700,000 won to be suspended;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) (100,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 59 (1) of the Criminal Act of the Suspension of Sentence (The fact that the defendant is a disabled person, the defendant has no record of being punished for the same kind of crime before, and the gains gained by the crime are insignificant, economic circumstances, etc.