If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

No person shall commit any act impeding the original purpose or use of agricultural infrastructure by destroying major structural parts of the agricultural infrastructure, thereby hindering the Defendant’s original purpose or use thereof. Around April 24, 2013, the Defendant destroyed the 115 square meters by taking advantage of the crums, which is owned by the Ministry of Construction and Transportation, the agricultural infrastructure located in North Korea, around 10:00, on the ground that the public official in charge at the time of the construction of the farm-ro package adjacent to the Defendant at the time of the Defendant’s return of the Defendant’s return that the public official did not follow the promise on the ground that he did not follow the promise on the ground that he did not refuse to pack the agricultural products to the adjacent farmers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement of the accused in the second protocol of trial;

1. G statements;

1. A written accusation;

1. Each land cadastre;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (Attachment of On-Site photographs);

1. Relevant Article 130 (1) 1 of the Rearrangement of Agricultural and Fishing Villages Act and Articles 18 (3) 1 of the same Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;