Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 40,000,000 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate of 20% from March 8, 2009 to September 30, 2015.

Reasons

1. The Plaintiff filed the instant lawsuit for the purpose of the extension of prescription, even though the judgment based on the case was rendered by the Seoul Central District Court 2008Da450763, the Plaintiff and the Defendant as executive title. However, the Plaintiff did not receive repayment from the Defendant to a close range of 10 years from the date the judgment became final and conclusive.