A Imprisonment with prison labor of one year and six months, Defendant B's imprisonment with prison labor of six months, and Defendant C shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor of four months.

except that this shall not apply.

1. Defendant A’s sole criminal conduct knew of the fact that the victim E (n, 47 years of age and 47 years of age) and the victim E was hedging from November 2012, and around June 2013, Defendant A knew of the fact that the victim E was living together with the other male victim F (the age of 51), followed the victim E, and forced the victim E to leave the victim and take the victim in writing.

On October 19, 2013, at around 17:45, the Defendant discovered E and the victim F, who were engaged in harvesting fish at the top field in front of a collection center located in Gohapcheon-gun G, Gyeongcheon-gun, and was prepared in advance, assaulted the victim F, by spreading the red powder amount in the face of the victim F twice.

B. The Defendant in violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective injury with a deadly weapon, etc.) has not been prosecuted for a separate crime of assault against the Defendant, when and at the same time, when and at the place specified in the preceding paragraph, when and at the face of the victim E, inferred the victim E once, and sculging the red powder amount into the face of the victim E;

The victim E, who deducteds the head of the family in his possession of the victim E, was injured by two times the part of the victim E, but the head was once, and the part of the victim E, who was in need of approximately three weeks of treatment, was sleeped by the victim E.

C. On October 19, 2013, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (the destruction and damage, etc. of a deadly weapon, etc.) stated that around 18:00 on October 19, 2013, the Defendant: (a) discovered a H spacker truck, which was the victim F owned by the victim E; (b) 2 spacks off two spackers between the front glass of the said cargo vehicle and the repair cost; and (c) there is no evidence to acknowledge the amount equivalent to the market value of the damaged smartphone.

3. The amount of money to be distributed.