(b) Intrusiond buildings;

Attorney in charge of AF, AG, AH

Examining the reasoning of the judgment of the court below in light of the evidence duly adopted by the court below, it is just to acknowledge the facts of the public prosecution of this case (excluding the part of innocence) as guilty on the grounds as stated in the judgment of the court below, and it is not erroneous in the misapprehension of the legal principles as to the indirect evidence and impeachment evidence, the probative value of proof and impeachment evidence, the principle of direct trial attention and the principle of direct trial attention by failing to exhaust all necessary deliberations like the argument of the grounds of appeal.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed, and it is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

Justices Kim So-young

Justices Lee Ki-taik