If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

On August 4, 2012, the Defendant is an architect who conducts a building permit investigation and inspection at the office Kimhae-si B, and submitted a construction permit investigation and inspection report prepared to the effect that there was no part of the building in violation of the construction permit investigation and inspection report prepared by Kimhae-si, Kimhae-si, and the owner of the building located in 2401, as Kimhae-si, in relation to the application for the permission for the second construction, large-scale repair, and alteration of the use of the second building, the Defendant reported the above factory to the Mayor in writing. The fact is different from the level of the first building construction, large-scale repair, and alteration of the use of the building permitted on May 2, 2012.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of police suspect regarding D;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on the written accusation;

1. Article 109 of the Building Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense and Articles 109 and 27 (2) of the Act on the Selection of Punishment;

2. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse.

3. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.