However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. 업무방해 피고인은 2014. 4. 13. 14:20경부터 같은 날 15:00경까지 사이에 서울 종로구 C시장에 있는 피해자 D이 운영하는 빈대떡 상점에서, 술에 취한 상태로 아무런 이유 없이 "씨발 좆같네"라고 큰 소리로 욕설을 하면서 막걸리 사발을 흔들어 뿌리고, 식탁을 발로 3~4회 차서 음식을 엎고, 악을 쓰면서 땅바닥에 뒹굴어 그곳에 있던 손님들이 정상적으로 식사를 할 수 없게 함으로써 약 30여 분간 위력으로 피해자의 식당영업 업무를 방해하였다.

2. The Defendant engaged in the obstruction of performance of official duties: (a) the date and time as indicated in paragraph (1) of this Article; (b) the Defendant: (c) reported 112 on the same background as indicated in paragraph (1) at the place; and (d) the Seoul Hye Police Station E-gu Seoul Hyan Police Station; and (c) the police officer assigned to the E-gu Seoul Hyean Police Station E-gu; and (d) the police officer called “in 28 crimes; (c) the flue is the flue player; and (d) the flue player was the flue player; and (d) the flue flue flue flue flue flue flue flue flue flue flue flue flue flue flusing the flue flue flue flue flue flue f; and (d) the flue flue f.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officials.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of F, H, and D respective statements (including photographs of damage);

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act: