Defendant

A fails to pay the above fine; 50.

Defendant

A Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the “Defendant Co., Ltd.”) is a company engaged in the production of PVC window at the place of business located in PVC at the time of strike, and Defendant A is the representative of

Any person who intends to install emission facilities shall obtain permission from a Mayor/Do Governor or report thereon to the Mayor/Do Governor, as prescribed by Presidential Decree.

1. Defendant A, without reporting to the competent administrative agency from August 2, 2012 to August 22, 2013, without reporting the aforementioned to Defendant A, installed one of the painting facilities (a approximately 4,000 cubic meters) and one of the drying facilities (around 600 cubic meters), which are air pollutant emitting facilities in the company’s factory, in the above company’s factory, and operated his/her business using the above facilities.

2. The Defendant Company: (a) the inside director A, a representative of the Defendant Company, committed an act described in paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Copy of corporate register or business registration certificate;

1. Report on results of business trips;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. The Defendants of relevant criminal facts: Articles 95, 90 subparagraph 1, and 23 (1) of the Clean Air Conservation Act; and

1. Defendant A who is selected to impose a fine;

1. Defendant A at a workhouse: Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act or more.