However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 02:30 on September 25, 2016, the Defendant ordered her bb and drinking in a restaurant operated by the victim C (the age of 54) in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu. B. However, the Defendant heard the victim’s phrase “I do not sell alcoholic beverages to the customers under the influence of alcohol. I do not sell alcoholic beverages. I do so.” At the cooling house in the above restaurant, I would like to listen arbitrarily to the victim, and I would like to say, “I am h, I h,” and again, from the victim, I am "I h, I h, I h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h", and I am at the restaurant with the opinion of the police officers in the Ulsan-gu, Busan-gu Police Station G.

피고인은 같은 날 03:30경 다시 위 식당에 찾아와서 피해자에게 “내 여기 보복하러왔다.”라고 말을 하다가 함께 온 일행들로부터 제지를 받으면서 위 식당에서 나가게 되었고, 이에 두려움을 느낀 피해자는 영업 종료시간이 되지 아니하였음에도 즉시 식당의 문을 닫고 조명을 끄고 있던 중, 피고인은 같은 날 04:00경 다시 위 식당을 찾아와 식당의 문을 손으로 세게 두드리면서 “야이, 씨발년아, 문열어라. 다 때려 부숴버린다. 내 여기 돗자리에 앉아서 오늘도 내일도 장사 못하게 할거다.”라고 소리를 쳤다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's restaurant operation by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on criminal place and investigation result reporting

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act [the scope of recommending sentence] interference with the business of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, the area of mitigation (one month to eight months) (special mitigation) [the decision of sentencing] of the mitigation area (special mitigation] of punishment (the decision of sentence] of the defendant has been punished several times for the same crime, but the victim is not heavier than the degree of damage and is punished by agreement with the victim.