2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

A. The Plaintiff is a police officer who was appointed as a policeman on March 21, 1992 and served in the Seoul Yangcheon Police Station B District on December 1, 2012. From May 24, 2014 to May 24, 2014.

B. The Defendant, as indicated below, posted a letter on the “C” bulletin board of the National Police Agency’s Internet network (hereinafter “instant bulletin board”) (hereinafter “instant disciplinary action”), and applied Articles 56 and 17(1)1 through 3 of the State Public Officials Act to refer the Plaintiff to the Seoul Yangyang Police Station General Disciplinary Committee by applying Article 56 and Article 17(1)1 through 3 of the State Public Officials Act. On May 16, 2014, the Seoul Yangyang Police Station General Disciplinary Committee decided the Plaintiff’s salary reduction in March, 2014, and the Defendant imposed the Plaintiff a disciplinary action for salary reduction in March on May 19, 2014.

[Fact of Disciplinary Action] Police officers shall observe all relevant Acts and subordinate statutes, serve in good faith, and shall not interfere with organization discipline or interfere with internal decision-making.

현재 영화 촬영에 사용되는 예술소품용 총기류는 실제 총기의 총구에 어댑터를 장착한 형태로 간단한 조작으로 실탄 발사 가능하지만, 총포ㆍ도검ㆍ화약류 등 단속법에는 예술소품용 총기류에 대한 구체적 명문 규정이 없어 경찰청에서 ‘09.5.25. 예술소품용 총기안전관리 강화 대책’ 공문을 하달하여 현실적 필요에 따라 촬영 후 반출하는 조건으로 허가권자를 지방청장으로 규정했다.

Nevertheless, the plaintiff asserts that the director general of Seoul Cheong-gu Office and the director of the living safety division ordered unfair business operations during three years prior to his work, and 1) on April 2, 2014, around 18:53, 2014, on the bulletin board of the internal net "C bulletin board, which had taken place for promotion and work in front of three years old fire, was about the conscience of the former head of Seoul Y and the head of the present local government office.